Archive for October 2010
… is the topic of my recent piece in PresenTense magazine (available here). The community is very unique and I hope people find the piece worthwhile.
However, there was also much that I was unfortunately unable to include in the piece due to space limitations. Here just a few of them:
One of Fairfield’s residents is Emo Baer. You can buy his self-published autobiography through resellers at Amazon. It is an interesting book that follows a diary-like story written by Emo later in life, but recalling the earlier events in his life. It illustrates his life fleeing Nazi Germany, settling in pre-state British Palestine, serving in various wars, and, eventually, following his family into Transcendental Meditation (TM) and half-way around the globe to Fairfield.
Haim Menashehoff is briefly mentioned in my PresenTense piece, but his story is much more interesting than I had room to describe. He got tired of “running from Muslims” in the streets of Tehran, even during the time of the Shah. After making aliyah to Israel, he traveled the world as an artist and settled in South Africa for a while before eventually being more fully drawn to TM. That interest eventually pulled him to Fairfield.
An issue I could not explore in the article is something that our Orthodox Jewish friends would find familiar. I mentioned the golden domes (note the plural) in Fairfield, but never explored why there was more than one. TM is, presumably for reasons not dissimilar to Orthodox davening, practiced in gender separated environments. There is a men’s dome and a women’s dome in Fairfield. This is just one of a few more traditional aspects of a practice that is seen as non-traditional by many outsiders.
Fairfield is a very interesting place and it is worth visiting if you want to get a picture of one of Iowa’s more diverse communities. Congregation Beth Shalom has a nice background on the Fairfield Jewish community on their website if you are interested.
One more thing. I also was unable to properly recognize Ben Winkler and Yael Yaar for their help on the story. Ben spent a fair deal of time with me helping me get a feel for Fairfield. Yael was indespensible for helping me understand the intellectual, ideological, and religious dynamics at play. Even though they were not mentioned in the final edited draft, both played a huge part in the story.
A Film Unfinished is showing now at the Bijou Theater at the University of Iowa. The Israeli documentary covers the known and lost footage taken by the Nazis of the Warsaw Ghetto.
I saw it last night and it is a very powerful film that makes even those familiar with the Holocaust pause in consideration of the terror of Naziism … well before the Jews were sent to the gas chambers.
Here is a preview:
Go watch it at the Bijou … between now and Thursday.
Ishmael Khaldi works for the Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs, most recently as Deputy Consul in the San Francisco consulate. He speaks for the Jewish state of Israel and being a Muslim is no barrier to that fact.
He spoke clearly about the threats to Israelis – all Israelis – emanating from Iran, Hamas, Hezbollah, and the delegitimization campaign against Israel. Whether it is Iran’s race for nuclear weapons or the Boycott Divest and Sanction movement, these threats are threats to Arabs and Jews and others in Israel and often elsewhere.
I have met few people who have so clearly expressed the case for the Jewish state and the common bond shared among many Israelis – Jew and Arab alike. Most striking was his explanation of the work that many Bedouins did to help give birth to the Jewish state. For, while Israel’s independence is often simply described as the cause of war between Jews and Arabs, Khaldi made clear that a sizeable number of Bedouins supported the pre-state Jewish community and the state of Israel.
His was a story not lost on those of us familiar with the long tradition of Druze assistance to the Jewish community. Once one peels back the simple narratives, one sees the plural multiculturalism that defines Israel as not just a Jewish state, but also as a democratic and liberal one. Khaldi is just one of many examples of that multicultural liberal reality.
I updated my Useful Links and Web Tools page today. If you don’t use Google Reader, Evernote, Dropbox, Instapaper and bit.ly already follow the links there and get with the program.
On Thursday, I went to the Christians United for Israel ‘Night to Honor Israel’ in Davenport. The 2,400 seat Adler Theater was filled nearly to capacity with conservative evangelical Christians. This is not typically my sort of crowd. Conservative preacher Pastor John Hagee, who is among the best known conservative evangelicals in America, was the keynote speaker. The crowd was filled with people who have a strict view of a different faith than mine and who have fairly severe differences with me on a wide range of social policies.
And yet, I was warmly welcomed, as a Jew, among these people. Hagee made clear that his love and support for the Jewish people is not based on any expectation that we convert to Christianity or any other sort of compromise of our beliefs. The crowd echoed that view.
And so, I wonder, why is it that among the supposedly tolerant and accepting people on the left here in Iowa City, I feel no tolerance; while among the typically less tolerant and conservative Christians, I feel real tolerance … even acceptance?
By way of example, a far-left Democrat from here in Johnson County, told me at the state Democratic Convention that I was a disloyal American and that I should leave and move to Israel. I feared nothing like that on Thursday evening. In fact, I experienced the opposite … my Jewish identity was seen as a patriotic expression of my American heritage. God bless these people for showing me real acceptance.
My column is up at the Press-Citizen. Here it is:
Let’s be honest.
The state law that prohibits alcohol for 18-year-olds is stupid.
The federal law that promotes such a policy is not only stupid, but an obscene abuse of federal power.
These laws really do not require sophisticated criticism. The only thing that is difficult to understand about the laws is how they have managed to remain in existence for so long.
Iowa City policy that bars 18-year-olds from establishments that serve alcohol are really just doubling down on a stupid policy.
The prohibition of alcohol for those younger than 21 already creates a rich market in false identification and identity theft. But that market is promoted principally among those who want to exercise the right to purchase alcohol directly. People who want to exercise those rights through the acts of others have little incentive to obtain a false identity.
Current Iowa City policy raises the bar. Now those who merely want to share a social environment with people who are in a drinking establishment must obtain false identification. This sort of identity fraud is bad in itself, but it also creates wider channels for a wide variety of identity fraud-related scams and crimes.
That is a fairly unique problem promoted by the 21-only policy, but the shift in alcohol consumption caused by this policy is troubling on many levels. Of course, some may argue that total consumption goes down because of the policy, but that seems rather unlikely given that most high school students can fairly readily obtain alcohol. College students have many more options.
Bars have incentives to protect their customers that house and apartment dwellers do not have. Bars enrich the nightlife of Iowa City in a way that house parties do not. Bars do not have readily available areas where men can easily rape women; houses do. Bars can be openly patrolled by police without a warrant; houses cannot. Commercial districts are better suited than residential neighborhoods to the heavy traffic and noise that goes with drunken revelry. Where do we want people to drink?
However, none of this addresses the core problem. That is, 18-year-olds suddenly free of parental constraint, 21 year-olds experiencing nominal “freedom,” and a variety of others indulge irresponsibly in their alcohol consumption and cause many problems.
Whether they drink at bars or houses, this core problem remains.
A better solution requires that we, as citizens, as a city, and as a state petition our elected federal representatives to repeal the insane federal laws that promote a 21-year-old drinking age. The best solution, in the long run, might even be to abolish the drinking age entirely or reduce it to, perhaps, 14.
Let’s imagine a 14-year-old drinking age. The first opportunity for a person to drink legally would happen when they are under their parents’ care, without the financial means to buy much alcohol, unable to drive, and generally incapable of creating an environment conducive to irresponsible drinking. The novelty of drinking openly once a person arrived at college would be substantially reduced. The aggressive binge drinking that is the rite of many 21-year-olds would be non-existent.
More personally and locally, I suspect Curtis Fry would not have gotten obscenely drunk on his 21st birthday. He would not have brutally beaten my friend, Patrick McEwen, to death at Patrick’s apartment on South Van Buren Street.
Fry’s parents seem like good people. Had Fry been able to legally drink as a 14 year-old, they would have raised him in a way that prevented him from killing someone.
He would not be in prison today.
For me, imagining an alternate reality where a young man is not a killer and an old man is not brutally killed is compelling enough.